https://www.sportskeeda.com/tennis/news-novak-djokovic-s-career-grand-slam-winning-racket-fetches-highest-price-ever-tennis-racket-auction
https://www.sportskeeda.com/tennis/news-novak-djokovic-s-career-grand-slam-winning-racket-fetches-highest-price-ever-tennis-racket-auction
I am beginning to sense entitlement. The article leaves out that the 23 Grand Slam Winner, Djokovic, didn't play the U.S. Open in 2022 because he was banned from entry. Not having points to defend from tournaments you couldn't play is no advantage because he would have likely been #1 all the time and not have to gain it again. It's good to have a rivalry but the media should be less biased.
If you watched the final and didn't notice the seemingly endless ball bouncing Novak does before each serve, then you aren't watching. The question is, why?
Novak could train himself out of it. There must be an element of
stress on everyone, including himself, when he does the extended ball
bouncing. The umpire knows he'll get flak for letting him go past time
and will also be hit with flak for inserting himself into the match for
calling him on it. Novak has to worry about getting a warning as well so it raises his tension. Maybe that's the purpose.
The
opponent might be annoyed over it as well, causing anxiety. Maybe if it
was to get in the head of an opponent then it's an understandable ploy
but not good sportsmanship.
I think it's more about
an OCD (obsessive-compulsive disorder) routine. It's one thing to grab
your rear regularly or line up your drinks like Rafa, that's on his own
time. This directly impacts play.
Other Bad Habits
While we're on the subject of habits that could go, I'd suggest to never hit a ball after the point ends since it cost him a tournament. Either underhand toss the ball or drop them in place and let the ball kids do their job.
Skip the racket abuse altogether. Add a wire cutter in the bag so he can just methodically cut the strings out of the offending frame while on changeover rather than smashing it and torquing his arm and getting fined.
All of these habits have been costly to him.
Today, Novak's first serve was non-existent. He could have saved energy and just hit 2nd serves. It's hard to win matches like that and he came close. They had an equal number of games and Novak came up short by 1 point compared to Alcaraz's point total.
Novak did this with a gone-missing serve today. It's not clear and may not be clear until we see a pattern. To those
that think Novak is now finished, keep in mind that simply getting to
the final of a grand slam event is a career defining event for most
professionals.
Novak is an excellent exemplar of the key character indicators of hard work, discipline, stick-to-it, and single-minded-focus that define grit. If you want the guy that glad-hands everyone and is always perfectly political, then he might not be the miss-congeniality winner. The joke that became the best sportsman awards in tennis should tell us all how meaningless those items are when it comes to judging the best player.
I feel that much of this shade thrown over Novak is from the media narrative. He is the usurper on the Fedal dynasty. Many strongly partisan Fed fans were unhappy when Nadal began to overtake him not just in numbers but in H2H results. Their friendship was a good media device for tennis for sure.
Thee are also cultural considerations. Many Western sensibilities don't like the strong defiance and resolute determination that Novak displays against hostile crowds that often favored Fed or Nadal or other crowd favorites. He doesn't taunt them like Mac used to do but he will not back down. This is part of a national character that some perceive as arrogance while most in the English speaking countries go with the humble warrior model and most conform to that role.
Add in his personal choice to decline an experimental medical treatment and to accept the penalty of not playing as is his right. Yet he was vilified by many of the tennis establishment for not taking the knee and the jab. Arguments that this is arrogant are often put forth by compliant dupes that will line up for anything. I don't hear from many of the former pushers of this bragging about their boosters any longer now that we know the risks involved.
Stretching for flexibility is key in Injury prevention to ensure longevity. Here is the best example.
Novak - "So whoever I get to face across the net, it doesn't make a difference for me. I need to do what I need to do."
The Real #1 by Jason
https://lastwordonsports.com/tennis/2023/06/30/novak-djokovic-real-world-number-one/
Expert Picks - Wimbledon 2023
Drucker - Djokovic
Fitzgerald - Djokovic
Kane- Djokovic
Levey - Djokovic
Livaudais Alcaraz
McGrogan - Djokovic
Tignor - Djokovic
https://www.tennis.com/news/articles/wimbledon-men-s-semifinal-final-champion-predictions-can-alcaraz-or-djokovic-be-
https://ausopen.com/articles/news/expert-picks-who-will-be-wimbledon-champions-2023
Since the focus and cutoff is the Open era, players like Laver and Rosewall are lower on the list than they would normally rank. See the legend at the bottom to understand the methodology. I found it interesting. https://www.ultimatetennisstatistics.com/goatList
McNamee wrote, "For me, not a good look." I agree it's not.
Taking 2,000 points last year from the Wimbledon winner was decided by the ATP players council. Both Fed and Rafa were on the council along with an assortment of players that had no expectation of winning the tournament. It was an easy decision to punish your leading rival.
Alcaraz lost less than 200 points from that move. He's not complicit in that but has surely benefited. Alcaraz gains the #1 ranking and top seed at Wimbledon by 80 points.
So getting disqualified is subjective? That seems apparent over time. After the point is over, players should roll the ball. Or, not touch it. Solutions?
Here is the story of the Miyu Kato disqualification.
It is getting ridiculous. They should institute physical and mental toughness training for the ball kids and line judges. If I were playing for money, I'd never hit the ball after the point ends due to this risk of disqualification.
This rings true about the lost opportunities for the second Golden Age of Tennis.
Many in tennis media cannot let go of their personal bias. It makes them sound as if they know little about tennis and sports. Here is a good example.
Kyrgios
just asked on Twitter why they don't have tournaments on carpet courts.
This might help explain why. They even had exhibitions on wood back
in the '60s and '70s. Most wouldn't want to face a big serve and volley
player on either surface.
Here is why they dropped them among other reasons.
One key stat that stands out glaringly. Novak's percentage of tie breaks won is 80%. All he has to do is hold his serve and get to a tiebreaker. He will win the match.
Assuming that you can hold your serve, develop the mindset of Novak to lock down and give no points away in a tiebreaker.
All of the hype around Alcaraz put a lot of pressure on him. It's not helping him. The tennis media and establishment make him seem the inevitable winner and odds-on favorite. Novak came in as the underdog taking lots of pressure off of him.
This may end her career. Very sad story. I'm beginning to doubt the whole testing regimen for athletes. It would be easy to expose someone to various banned substances without their knowledge whether intentionally or unintentionally.
Headline: Monica Seles's assailant relocates to the afterlife and complains about the lack of air conditioning while taking the elevator down
This was a terrible event for tennis as Seles may have been the best ever woman player based on her amazing results so early in her career cut shot by a crazed attacker bent on giving Graf a helping hand.
Comments by Martina indicate that she felt Seles had to be among the very best ever but for the career damaging attack.
Seles attacker moves on.
https://hackaday.com/2023/04/03/tennis-balls-serve-as-decent-bicycle-tires-that-dont-easily-puncture/
Interesting fact for Sinner: now 3-3 with Alcaraz after Miami. He has beaten Alcaraz on clay, hard courts, and grass.
https://www.atptour.com/en/players/atp-head-2-head/jannik-sinner-vs-carlos-alcaraz/S0AG/A0E2Alcaraz is out of Monte Carlo due to injures. Nadal should have had a limited career due to his extremely physical game. He overcame it.
Alcaraz has a similar challenge. He needs to learn from Nadal, if possible. If this pattern continues, he won't fulfill his ambitions and the predictions by some that he'll surpass the Big three.
He could be out of tennis in five years if injuries pile up. Ask Del Potro.
Short hair is easy to wash. You can dry it fast with a swipe of a towel without the need for mirror gazing and waving your head around in front of a blow dryer.
I'd love to see a defined foot placement diagram for each term used such as open stance, squared stance closed stance, or crossover. To me, a squared stance is heels aligned perpendicular to the net with the front foot pointed forward at an approximate 45-degree angle. As a kid, this was also often described to me as closed.
Open seems obvious enough. Your rear foot is parallel to the baseline on your last step off of either side when hitting either forehand or two handed backhand. An open stance on a one handed backhand is not usually effective and I don't suggest it. It would be an emergency shot and it limits reach.
Teaching volleys we used the term cross step or crossover. This stance is usually only good for one handed backhands or forehands on the run. Shouldn't that apply to a groundstrokes in the same fashion?
Swiatek wants more support for Ukrainian Players
Wow, talk about putting your thumb on the scale. Med's complaints about slow courts would make sense if they set things up to favor Nadal. Add some grit to the surface coat paint and it will play like sandpaper as balls get fuzzy quickly with slow bounces that sit up.
1248 Weeks in the top 10 according to my math.
"Muscles hung on in the top ten until 1976, 24 years after his first appearance on that list. He continued to enter tour events until 1980. At age 45, he won his first-round match at all three tournaments he played."
I still subscribe to the GOAT herd philosophy. But "there can be only one" leading the herd. The current battle for that, if it's only slam events, is still ongoing until retirements settle it.
Novak's biggest mistake was not understanding the grip of insanity that has overtaken the tribe of media and submissive mobs of once citizens, now subjects and again in Australia.
The writer must not know a lot about tennis if it says most can't see that Novak's brilliance is unrecognizable and his matches are boring. If you watched his last few matches at the AO you would notice that he changed his pattern of play to compensate for his hamstring injury. He became very aggressive. Knowledgeable players and tennis fans saw this.
As for his father's problems with media. It's in the head of the woke mob in the media that this was a big deal. Nobody cares if he stands next to some Russians with their flag.
Finally, last year's debacle was one for the AO since it has proven only that it is among the countries that doesn't respect personal autonomy versus the collective. They behaved badly toward their citizens and toward guests.
Read the article if you want to confirm my observations.
The Stubbs post declaring that the women's final surpassed the men in viewership was factually incorrect. Yet, she used them to suggest that women's tennis had finally arrived. It was a great match but don't pretend that the men's final was ho-hum. It was a retribution for last year when Novak was arbitrarily confined and sent home due to mass psychosis in play in Australia. A year later most know he was right to take the stand that he did. A few holdouts that can't admit a mistake continue on with their attacks.
She used Australian numbers. Very parochial. No Aussies in the finals. Barty was the previous big draw before on the women's side. Viewership on the women's side dropped the most this time. I'd like to see international numbers.
Update: she took the post down because of the heavy response to the fake numbers.
Citizen fact checkers win the day.
He wanted this enough to make the calculation and played around his injury with more aggressive play to end points quickly. As he ages, this approach may become his way of extending his career.
Here a doctor suggests it wasn't that bad.
AO Chief comments regarding Novak injury under a Microscope
Anyone judging a hamstring tear must have never suffered a hamstring injury. It is debilitating and lethal to your ability to move. Fear of making it worse can make you tentative. Novak took a different approach and went for winners knowing he had to end the points earlier.
In response to an Opinion piece in The Age by Andrew Webster - Why we can't bring ourselves to say Novak Djokovic is the GOAT.
So Novak is a villain because he didn't take a now problematic treatment as was and is his right to medical and bodily autonomy. So far it has cost him participation in two Grand Slam events thanks to political maneuverings. He turned out to be the smarter one than the crowd that were stampeded or forced into submission to the experimental effort. One thing he also didn't do that he could have done is get a fake card indicating that he did get one. You don't think he could have done that with enough money thrown at it. His integrity didn't allow him to go there.
As for his on-court behavior. Most of the writers never experienced the battle of emotion and willpower needed to function alone on a tennis court in a competition. Getting heckling drunks tossed out of a stadium is a rational and reasonable approach to asking for respect not just for himself but also for the other fans. Somehow, the tennis media and umpire didn't seem to get that the drunks weren't the only ones in the stadium entitled to enjoy a tennis match.
As for his lack of strengths as the author of the article describes, I then begin to question the writer's knowledge of tennis. Aside from great groundstrokes, Novak has impeccable footwork and balance making his range of coverage among the very best ever. His fitness level is a weapon in itself. He has the best return of serve in the game right now.
There is more but let me finally just say, his mental strength on the court is what causes his wins to materialize. He has the complete set of physical skills combined with the mental toughness that allows him to play against his opponent and a stadium of unfriendly tennis fans and win. Most players can't handle a nasty and biased crowd where Novak just soldiers forward and wins matches. A great competitor can find a way to overcome adversity. A GOAT brings home the numbers to back it up and prove it with receipts.
We will know the outcome of the GOAT debate in tennis when Novak and Rafa finally retire. Until then, the final tally isn't proven though in almost every category Novak equals or greatly exceeds the best of our time and those that came before. Some are invested in other players and cannot imagine that their chosen player isn't the best so they choose metrics like fan favorite or best sportsman to justify the GOAT designation. It only proves that the other numbers fall short for them to resort to that.
This was unfortunate and I believe that he didn't know the politics of the fans involved.
Fans like this need to be banned. It's not just about the players. It's about the fans that come to watch tennis.
Go to a football game where it's expected if you want to get sloshed.
Some argue that minus injuries he would have 4 or 5 more wins at the Australian Open.
He could have had 4 or 5 more if Novak wasn't there as last year proved.
The same argument
could apply to Novak taking more French Open titles if Rafa wasn't
there.
This is not his best surface and carries more injury risk for him.
This is a nice NYT article that feels balanced in reporting compared to previous accounts by most sports writers last year. Many are still glued to their anger at Novak for not submitting.
The Long Game: This philosophy is the way to continuous improvement in any endeavor. Incremental improvements for changing circumstances are better than complete overhauls once you've reached a high level of performance. Thoughts?
It's nice to see Nick finding some balance and appearing to mature. Kind words for the big 3, now 2.
We had fun playing tennis in the rain and high wind as kids. Now, no lessons with wet courts for safety and liability reasons but with wind conditions, it's okay unless equipment flies around. I'd guess above 30mph would make it problematic but players have to learn to play in it.
It's easy to judge someone at a distance. I remember when Fed and Novak were beset with problems that caused them to quit playing a match. No one would call either of them wimps now with justification. Her problems started with coaching changes that were from advice she took based on her age and inexperience. Hopefully, she'll begin to trust her own counsel.
This is a nice act of kindness to help repay that same support Nick game him last year.
. net