All of the hype around Alcaraz put a lot of pressure on him. It's not helping him. The tennis media and establishment make him seem the inevitable winner and odds-on favorite. Novak came in as the underdog taking lots of pressure off of him.
All of the hype around Alcaraz put a lot of pressure on him. It's not helping him. The tennis media and establishment make him seem the inevitable winner and odds-on favorite. Novak came in as the underdog taking lots of pressure off of him.
At some point, the question has to be asked, is this precisely the situation, or is it overstated? He keeps coming back and playing and shows no noticeable reduction in function. I doubt how bad it is, so when do we call BS?
I suppose at least we'll have a face-off between the two best players on this surface.
They put the three strongest players against each other in the top half
of the draw, thus leaving the lower half an easier run to the final. It
also means the two or three most likely final players have been forced
down to one of them.
Whoever set the draw had a plan, and it turns out much like they hoped I suspect, and it wasn't to get the two best players a chance to reach the final. This will weaken the winner of this contest in the semi-final match, and the final presuming one of them makes it through.
I've reached the conclusion that they're trying to level the field by forcing them to face each other earlier than they should. Plus, putting the two best against each other earlier means they might be worn down for a final against the younger side of the draw.
As for Nadal mentioning his time preference for play, it doesn't hurt to ask. I favor Novak in this match-up, but I do understand that Rafa has a preferred time of play. Not mentioning might cost him an edge.
It's unfair to receive this type of treatment. Mac was disgusted with the crowd. It may be that they wanted an underdog to win, but unkind fan behavior often fuels Novak to excellence.
I can think of only one reason a crowd might show anger toward a player who is always respectful to his opponent, officials, and the audience. Like in Australia, much of the French population has been under pressure to submit to experimental vaccines, which has made them angry at those who show some individuality and courage not to surrender their beliefs. If not that, maybe they wanted the underdog to win which makes many of the fans just partisans.
It's a well-worn strategy. Your opponent may fall for the feigned weakness ploy, plus you get virtue signal points for battling through adversity.
This draw appears odd, so I have to assume that someone in charge has an agenda
more important than running a great tournament. It seems they want Rafa
and Novak out since if they meet early it might also reduce the
winner's chances in the next round due to recovery. Tsitsi appears to
be the organizer's preference in this draw. It could be that they want
to see an Alcaraz vs Tsitisi final. I'll describe this as the NextGen
draw.
The mandates are gone in France and the French Open Direction confirms that Novak can play.
The numbers prove it. More wins combined than Fed and Rafa.
This is the best way to measure dominance rather than a popularity contest.
Congratulations to Novak Djokovic on an amazing comeback in a pressure filled final where his reputation was again on the line.
I think this article from the French Open is superb and describes the challenges he has faced very well.
With all the celebration for Novak fans, keep in mind that this victory has to be followed up with a win over Tsitsipas to make the victory complete.
Tennys went for broke gambling on many shots to take points he normally wouldn't have won. He was playing very well. The article states it was effortless for Novak as if he just lolled around on his side of the net instead of the superb effort he applied to finish the job.
. net